India's Nuclear Fuel Shortage
Aug 6, 2008
In this article, Surendra Gadekar argues that the U.S.-India nuclear deal is unlikely to help India meet its burgeoning energy needs.
Daryl Kimball and Fred McGoldrick: IAEA-Indian Nuclear Safeguards Agreement: A Critical Analysis
Jul 30, 2008
On July 9, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) distributed the text of a proposed "umbrella" safeguards agreement between the Government of India and the IAEA that would cover a finite number of facilities that India will at some later point declare as "civilian."
Kingston Reif and Leonor Tomero: New Delhi's Nuclear Gains
Jul 30, 2008
In "A Civil Nuclear Power" (July 21), M.R. Srinivasan makes a number of arguments about the U.S.-India nuclear deal that do not withstand close scrutiny.
Kingston Reif and Leonor Tomero: The Rush to a Flawed Nuclear Deal
Jul 12, 2008
In his July 7 op-ed piece, "New Life for the India Nuclear Pact," Bill Emmott said that Congress must not allow India's close ties with Iran to hold up the U.S.-India nuclear deal and that the deal is worth pursuing.
Negotiating India's Next Nuclear Explosion
Jul 10, 2008
In this Op-Ed, Henry Sokolski explains why the U.S.-India nuclear deal is a bad deal.
New York Times Editorial: No Rush Please
Jul 5, 2008
Three years ago, President Bush offered India a far-too-generous nuclear deal.
Daryl Kimball: Contradictions Still Plague U.S.-Indian Nuclear Deal
Mar 3, 2008
Two and a half years after President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced their proposed U.S.-Indian civil nuclear cooperation deal, the ill-conceived arrangement faces a highly uncertain future.
Letter “Ensure Nuclear Cooperation with India Is Consistent with the Law”
Nov 1, 2007
from experts and former government officials to Members of Congress, urging improvements to the U.S.-India nuclear deal, May 14, 2007
Editorial: “From Bad to Worse,”
Nov 1, 2007
Henry Sokolski, "Devils Emerge from India Nuclear Deal"
Nov 1, 2007
In this article, Henry Sokolski describes the U.S. Administration’s push for the U.S.-India nuclear deal despite recent concern from Members of Congress and India’s on-going cooperation with Iran and exploration of nuclear deals with France and Russia.
Editorial: “A price too high: The rise of China is no reason to trample on the non-proliferation regime,”
Nov 1, 2007
Dalberg Global Development Advisors
Nov 1, 2007
Leonard Weiss, U.S.-India Nuclear Cooperation: Better Later than Sooner
Nov 1, 2007
On July 5, 2005, President George W. Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh signed an agreement pledging their governments to actions designed to culminate in a formal nuclear cooperation agreement that would end a three-decade U.S. nuclear embargo against India.
Dr. Ira Helfand, “As Assessment of the Extent of Projected Global Famine Resulting From Limited, Regional Nuclear War,”
Oct 1, 2007
“The recent study by Robock et al on the climatic consequences of regional nuclear war shows that even a “limited” nuclear conflict, involving as few as 100 Hiroshima-sized bombs, would have global implications with significant cooling of the earth's surface and decreased precipitation in many parts of the world.
Proceedings of the international conference "Security and Cooperation in South Asia: a Global Perspective"
Oct 1, 2007
Leonard S. Spector, with Leah Kuchinsky, “Australian Foreign Minister Said South Pacific Nuclear Treaty Bans Australian Uranium Exports to India”
Aug 27, 2007
Analysis on the source of Australia’s legal obligation not to export uranium to India.
Currently reading page 2 of 3.